Advantages of Promotion Based on Examination Over Interview
Promotion based on examinations involves administering a standardized test or examination to evaluate a candidate's knowledge, skills, and qualifications for the new position/Rank. The examination is usually designed to test specific skills and knowledge related to the job requirements, and the grading is done objectively, usually by multiple examiners. The candidate who scores the highest on the examination is typically considered for promotion.
Promotion based on interviews, on the other hand, involves evaluating candidates through a series of one-on-one or panel interviews. The interviews are usually conducted by one or more senior managers, and the questions are typically open-ended, designed to evaluate the candidate's personality, communication skills, leadership abilities, and other subjective criteria. The candidate who impresses the interviewer(s) the most is typically considered for promotion.
The main difference between promotion based on examinations and promotion based on interviews is the evaluation criteria. Promotion based on examinations relies on objective criteria such as knowledge and skills, while promotion based on interviews relies on subjective criteria such as personality and communication skills.
Overall, promotion based on examinations is considered a more objective, consistent, and transparent way of assessing candidates for promotion, while promotion based on interviews is more subjective, potentially introducing biases or favoritism in the selection process.
Promotion based on examination has several advantages over promotion based on an interview:
1 Objective assessment: An examination is a more objective way of assessing a candidate's skills and knowledge than an interview. The questions are designed to test specific skills and knowledge, and the grading is usually done by multiple examiners, which helps ensure that the assessment is fair and impartial.
2 Elimination of bias: Examinations help eliminate bias that can be introduced in interviews, such as personal preferences, stereotypes, or unconscious biases. Since the questions and grading criteria are standardized, all candidates are evaluated using the same criteria, making it more difficult for any one candidate to be favored or disadvantaged.
3 Consistency: Examinations are consistent across all candidates, ensuring that they are all evaluated using the same criteria. This means that the process is fair and transparent, and all candidates have an equal opportunity to demonstrate their skills and knowledge.
4 Test of preparation: Examinations are a test of preparation, and candidates who are serious about their careers are likely to prepare thoroughly for them. This ensures that the candidates who are promoted have the requisite knowledge and skills to perform their new roles effectively.
5 Cost-effective: Examinations are usually more cost-effective than interviews. Since the questions and grading criteria are standardized, the examination can be administered to a large number of candidates at the same time, reducing the need for multiple interviewers and the associated costs.
In summary, promotion based on examination is a more objective, consistent, and cost-effective way of assessing candidates for promotion, ensuring that the best candidates are selected based on their knowledge and skills.
